<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 Think Tank</title>
	<link>http://www.deepakalur.com/blog/2006/08/13/enterprise-20-think-tank/</link>
	<description>[ Deepak Alur's Blog ]</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Inchoate Curmudgeon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SOA and Governance</title>
		<link>http://www.deepakalur.com/blog/2006/08/13/enterprise-20-think-tank/#comment-628</link>
		<author>Inchoate Curmudgeon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SOA and Governance</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deepakalur.com/blog/2006/08/13/enterprise-20-think-tank/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>[...] In Enterprise 2.0 Think Tank Deepak states One of the recurring topics that kept popping up is Governance. And this is really key, because it is a very important aspect that we need to address in Enterprise 2.0. A couple of months ago, I attended the Gartner conference on SOA/Web Services where one of the analysts said something like - If you are doing SOA, you better be addressing governance. No governance, no SOA, no nada. And that is right on. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In Enterprise 2.0 Think Tank Deepak states One of the recurring topics that kept popping up is Governance. And this is really key, because it is a very important aspect that we need to address in Enterprise 2.0. A couple of months ago, I attended the Gartner conference on SOA/Web Services where one of the analysts said something like - If you are doing SOA, you better be addressing governance. No governance, no SOA, no nada. And that is right on. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
